Share your product feedback!

Please tell us what we can do to make INKY’s Email Security Platform the best product for you.

Inky admin permissions - allow granular control

Super Admin is currently required for onboarding customers, which also grants full product access. This means 10+ engineers in an MSP need Super Admin, with most of the rest needing policy management (the second highest tier). Best practice is least-privilege access. There should be more granular permissions: Separate role for user management at MSP level (internal IT owns this, not day-to-day support staff) Separate role for onboarding new customers (professional services/projects teams shouldn't need full admin) Separate permissions for mail security vs signature management (different staff, different skillsets) Granular control over viewing message bodies — currently restricted to Super Admin, but lower-level or custom roles should be able to view message content without full Super Admin access Ability to hide the Subject field by role — all roles can currently see subjects in analysis/observations message lists, and the recent "access denied" on restricted tenants doesn't prevent seeing subjects

Steven Richardson 6 months ago

8
📧

Email Security

Email Signature Customization — Styling, Layout, Logo & Fields

Consolidated request for a more flexible signature builder. Merged from multiple posts covering styling, layout, logo handling, field content, and preview. Specific asks: Typography & styling Per-line / per-field typography — font color, size, bold, and italic for each individual line and data field Adjustable padding/spacing (top of the signature, and before/after lines) Team Signature Data styling — per-field bold, color, and size (e.g. company name bold in brand color, user name slightly larger than body text) Layout & arrangement Reorder/reposition signature components (custom arrangement) Add line breaks in the field layout without hand-editing HTML Keep the social/contact block inline on an existing line instead of forcing a new line Multi-line company address (e.g. City / State / Zip on its own line) Logo & images Place the logo above or below the signature, not just left or right Make the logo clickable with a URL Use different logo images for Replies/Forwards vs New Messages Fields & content Static/global text fields — add fixed text anywhere (e.g. "Kind regards" at the top), beyond repurposing the Company Address field Control display-name format (First Last vs Last First pulled from M365) Communication/social icons — phone, mobile, email, web — with custom-icon support and a website option Selective hyperlinking — apply links to only the email/website, not phone numbers Preview Edit the sample/preview data used in the signature preview

Dana Aldom 6 months ago

11
🖋️

Signatures

Planned

Support Additional Phishing Awareness Training Platforms

MSPs use various phishing awareness and simulation training platforms that need to be recognized by INKY so that simulated phishing emails are not flagged as real threats. Requested platforms: Nimblr — not currently listed as an available awareness training platform. MSPs are working around it using the misconfigured service whitelist option. Cyberhoot — needs to be added as a checkbox option. IPs: 54.240.125.36/32 and 54.240.125.37/32. Quarterly phishing training emails get flagged due to vendor branding in links. Common ask: A standardized way to register awareness training platforms so that their simulation emails are recognized and handled appropriately — not flagged as phishing, brand impersonation, or other threats.

Matt Sywulak 3 months ago

2
📧

Email Security

Integration Between BullPhish ID and INKY User Phishing Reports

We are requesting improved integration between BullPhish ID (phishing simulations) and INKY (email security) to better handle user-reported simulated phishing emails. Current Issue: When a user correctly identifies and reports a BullPhish simulation using the “Report Phish” button, the message is treated as a real phishing incident by INKY. This results in: Unnecessary ticket creation (Autotask PSA) SOC/technician time spent reviewing false incidents User confusion due to lack of feedback Increased noise in phishing reporting workflows Requested Behavior: When a user reports a BullPhish simulation: The system should automatically recognize the message as a simulation (via headers, tagging, or integration). The user should receive immediate feedback such as: “Good catch — this was a simulated phishing test.” The event should be logged in BullPhish as a successful user action. The report should NOT: Generate a phishing incident in INKY Trigger SOC workflows or alerts Create tickets in Autotask Additional Suggestions: Introduce a header/tag (e.g., X-Phish-Simulation: BullPhish) for easy identification Allow MSPs to define handling rules for simulated phishing reports Provide reporting on user detection success without impacting security incident metrics Business Impact: Reduces false positives and alert fatigue Improves technician efficiency Enhances user training experience with immediate reinforcement Aligns phishing simulation outcomes with real-world SOC workflows This integration would significantly improve operational efficiency and the overall effectiveness of the Kaseya security stack.

Geoff Levy 3 months ago

1
📧

Email Security